I recently read an article in The Washington Post about - ready? - the political race. This one gave me a chuckle.
A Republican-led polling conglomerate asked a group of independents who had voted for President Obama in 2008 the following question: "If President Obama was a car, what kind of car would he be and why?"
Some entertaining answers:
Toyota Minivan: “He seems like a family person, so I put a nice minivan.”
Kia: “He’s sort of new and sort of reliable, but I don’t have enough information on him.”
Edsel: “It might have a good engine underneath, but out of touch with reality.”
I'd like to hear from you: If Obama AND Romney were cars, what kind of cars would they be and why?"
Andddd.....go.
Legal disclaimer: Carter Chevrolet and Mazda of Manchester do not have any political affiliation. The views of people commenting on this blog do not represent the views of our dealerships, but may in fact serve as entertaining debate for our staff when we are off the clock.
I'm Kyle Reyes and I approve this disclaimer.
Kyle S. Reyes is Director of Marketing for Carter Chevrolet and Mazda of Manchester.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/
I have to agree that Obama is the 2012 Chevrolet Volt. 1. Only the very wealthy can afford these cars 2. The car runs on expensive electricity and there are no plans to build more nuclear electric plants which we desperate need. 3. The Volt doesn't have long range so you better not go very far. 4. The Volt is made by General Motors which is still 30% owned by the United States government 5. If the taxpayers sell the stock back to General Motors stock, we will incur a $30,000,000,000 dollar loss Yeah... that sums it up. Obama is a Chevy Volt. All idealism. Lots of charisma and attracts attention but does not deliver. Not practical. Costs more than twice what other vehicles can do. Yeah... that sums it up. Obama is a Chevy Volt.
LiveForFreedom says "there are NO plans to build more nuclear electric plants which we desperae need". The Nuclear Regulatory Commission voted 4 to 1 on Thursday to grant a license to build and operate two reactors at a nuclear plant in Georgia, a crucial threshold for an industry that has not had a new start since 1978. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/business/energy-environment/2-new-reactors-approved-in-georgia.html What?? Obama pushed for more Nuclear Power Plants. President Obama, speaking to an enthusiastic audience of union officials in Lanham, Md., on Tuesday, underscored his embrace of nuclear power as a clean energy source, announcing that the Energy Department had approved financial help for the construction of two nuclear reactors in Georgia http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/17/business/energy-environment/17nukes.html Those darn pesky facts.
I just corrected LiveForFreedoms assertion regarding the building of Nuclear Power Plants. That's right, those Darn Facts.
Comments caught on video reveal that the GOP candidate thinks half of Americans are losers. This is an utter disaster for his campaign. http://money.msn.com/politics/post.aspx?post=358695c0-0d2d-403a-bfa9-77b81fa2674a
Norway. While the land mass of Norway cannot be compared to some of the other members on this list, Norway has made incredible strides in alternative energy. Most notably, in 2010, Norway built the world’s largest wind turbine. They have also invested in hydroelectricity, with 99% of their electrical needs being met through this alternative source and a smaller amount of investment in biomass.
Obviously for him it was a gaffe, since his entire campaign has been about trying to prove that he loves all the people who voted for Obama too. He has taken for granted anyone who likes R better than D. Had he spent more time massaging and cooperating with us from the libertarian party, he could have persuaded some of this group to support him instead of Gary Johnson. He's probably one of the weakest, most scared little fairy of a candidate that the Republicans have ever put up. Romney is always so terrified of saying something politically incorrect, or stepping on someone's toes... always worrying how the media might portray him. Not really surprising I guess, as a shill who supports the 2 party mafia. Seriously, how does this cost him the election? If anything, this motivates and emboldens his supporters. Unless you think all the liberals will not be more motivated and more emboldened by the remarks? Any part of that zombie 47% is unfortunately a lost cause anyway...
Wayne: All policy is foreign to RobME.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/09/18/the-data-behind-romneys-47-comments/ here is your factcheck on the same thing http://factcheck.org/2012/09/dependency-and-romneys-47-percenters/ The Obamas did in fact surrender the licenses to practice law and this is a reliable source, if only because they went to the legal source: http://finance.yahoo.com/mbview/threadview/?m=tm&bn=19051&tid=103524&mid=103524&tof=18&frt=2
Ron Paul is the Rolls Royce...