.

My Election Predictions

For us political geeks, this is our Super Bowl! And here’s how I see it playing out…

For us political geeks, this is our Super Bowl! And here’s how I see it playing out…

Barack Obama will be re-elected for a second term as President. His firewall of 271 Electoral Votes (including OH, PA, WI, and NV) will hold, even through recounts. The Senate will remain in the Democrats’s control, though they may lose one or gain one or two from their present count. The House will remain in GOP control. Despite the fact that 90% of Americans think congress is doing an awful job, a vast majority of incumbents – in both parties -- will be reelected. So called “Tea-Party” candidates who unseated incumbents in primaries will not fare very well.

Obama will barely win the popular vote (50.3%), though it will be weeks before that is ascertained, and by then few will care. Even if a low turnout gives Romney a slight (half a point or less) popular vote edge I believe Obama’s fire wall will hold for an electoral vote victory. In addition to his 271 base electoral votes, Obama could win up to an additional 61 electoral votes if:  1) he maintains his current momentum,  2) there are no last-minute October surprises, 3) the weather is good in Florida, Virginia, New Hampshire and Colorado on Election Day.  If I had to pin it down, I’d say Obama takes Iowa and New Hampshire for a total of 281 EV’s, and sends Colorado and Virginia to recounts. But you can’t rule out a close race in Florida.

In CT, Murphy will win, but McMahon may do better than she did against Blumenthal.  (But hopefully not well enough that she tries again!) Those looking for upsets in the CT Congressional races will be disappointed. But there may be some upsets and surprisingly close outcomes for incumbents in CT State seats, which I’m sure will be blamed on Dan Malloy and redistricting.

Here in Manchester, with no external polling data available, it’s hard to know if Cheri Pelletier will be able to match Chip Beckett’s vote plurality in Glastonbury from two years ago plus pick up enough votes in heavily Democratic Manchester to unseat popular incumbent Steve Cassano, even with the controversial and unsolicited help her candidacy received from a Fairfield County billionaire she’s never met or talked to.  Or if business community support and name recognition are enough to make a difference in Tim Devanney’s uphill battle against the personable and strongly labor-endorsed Geoff Luxenberg.  Redistricting, a strong record on locally important issues, and a weak opponent should make Jason Rojas an easy winner.  And with 13-term incumbent Jack Thompson gone, and the district reconfigured, it will be interesting to see if Mark Tweedie can put the 13th back into play for the Republicans.

On referendums, the school renovations should win easily, but the library vote will be a lot closer. We’ll see if Manchester voters are ready to put the issue to bed rather than see the controversy continue for another two to four years. I’m looking for a razor-thin “Yes” majority, but won’t be surprised if it goes the other way. Ironically, the foes of the library expansion are split into three distinct groups that have very little in common. One group is against any additional bonding/taxes in a bad economy – they’d vote “No” on any spending (and usually come out in force in Presidential Election years). The second group will vote “Yes” on the schools, but want to see the park and the original Cheney building “preserved.” (For who and for what I could not tell you!) The third group actually wants an even bigger and more modern library built in another location (the old Parkade is often mentioned) which would require bonding about three times as much money as the renovation. These groups have collectively thrown out a long list of often contradictory objections (parking, crossing streets, view of the park as you drive by, DVD rentals and yoga classes, should be bigger/smaller, etc.) that have really muddied the issue – which, of course, was often their intent.

Happy Election Day!

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

MAC November 05, 2012 at 08:15 PM
Romney is going to win the "popular vote" in a landslide! You are as wrong as your "October surprise" statement! (It's Nov. now.) Everyone who thinks Obama deserves another term needs to watch this video before voting, so that you know exactly what outcome you are voting for: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsa4uLmTw0M 7 1/2 minutes of extremely well presented fiscal facts about the disastrous path down "The New Road to Serfdom" our nation is on, and other information, including excerpts from well known former liberals, such as Ronald Reagan. Any Obama supporter who won't invest that much time to see this excellent video (not paid for by any campaign, the Koch brothers or any PAC) chooses to remain willfully blind or ignorant, imo--and will come to regret his re-election at some point (in that unlikely event). I do believe that Romney and Ryan, "America's Comeback Team" are going to win resoundingly tomorrow! That is because most Americans see the obvious differences between Obama, who wants people to vote for "revenge," and Romney, who calls on Americans to vote out of "Love for America!"
Joel Mrosek November 05, 2012 at 11:10 PM
If a partisan is going to offer biased opinions on an election outcome, where is the writer who holds the opposite and equally partisan view? I would be happy to offer my silly opinion as an appropriate counterpiece to this one!
Jerry O'Connor November 06, 2012 at 02:07 AM
Romney certainly has a chance of winning. Especially if the turnout is low. But it won't be in a landslide.
Jerry O'Connor November 06, 2012 at 02:16 AM
Tried not to be partisan, Joel -- except for the comment about Linda McMahon, but I know of no one who isn't tired of seeing her ads. I just give my predictions every year based on my long years of political observation. (Last time I was wrong on a Presidential election was in 1976 when I predicted Ford would edge out Carter.) My predictions aren't based on who I HOPE will win, but on who I BELIEVE will win (although sometimes the two coincide). I welcome -- as does Patch -- any analysis or disagreement with my forecasts or commentary.
Paul Proteus November 06, 2012 at 04:25 AM
Opponents seem to always be quite vocal on why Obama shouldn't be president.... But they always seem to have a tough time on why Romney should be....
Jerry O'Connor November 06, 2012 at 05:11 AM
I've noticed that myself. Seems like more people are voting "against" something than "for" something in any election since 1972 (Nixon - McGovern), or maybe even 1964 (Goldwater - Johnson). But those were both landslide elections, and I don't see that happening this time.
David Moran (Editor) November 06, 2012 at 05:43 AM
Joel, if you want to blog, send me an email: david.moran@patch.com.
Paul Proteus November 06, 2012 at 05:47 AM
Maybe we should ask the people of Massachussetts what they think........... Ah what do they know.
MAC November 06, 2012 at 07:57 AM
Paul you have obviously not been paying attention. Did you watch any of the debates? Romney is a statesman and very 'Presidential' in bearing compared to the nastiness and anger of Obama especially. Much more important, he honors the Constitution, the Separation of Powers, our Nation's history and American Exceptionalism, whereas Obama disparages all of those things, even dismissing the congress! Most importantly, Romney is a proven stellar EXECUTIVE, who has reached across the aisle when governor of MA, and 87 % of the legislature was Dem, to GET THINGS DONE!! He understands that America's Prosperity depends on Free Market Capitalism, and will have qualified people in his cabinet, to get America back on track to restoring our nation's former greatness and Prosperity. Obama had no executive experience, or Private sector experience at all! And he deplores capitalism, because he wants the government to control every aspect of Americans' lives possible. He loves government DEPENDENCY and 'trickle down' BIG government. Romney loves Freedom and opportunity for all. He will also be MUCH better in international relations, especially with Israel, and keeping Americans SAFE, as Obama did not, as in Benghazigate, where 4 Americans DIED, and Obama LIED about it, because he had been lying that "Al Quaeda has been decimated"! http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/10/31/benghazi_coverup_much_worse_than_third-rate_burglary_115997.html
Paul Proteus November 07, 2012 at 03:49 PM
Hey MAC..... I'll admit I didn't watch FOX news last night.... But was there a Romney landslide I missed somewhere????? :-)
Jerry O'Connor November 07, 2012 at 05:44 PM
So how'd I do? Not bad! President was re-elected, his base held and it looks like he'll get to 332 EV's with the states I predicted. (Yup, no surprises and the weather was good.) Pop. vote right now sits at the 50.3% I predicted, but it might yet tick up a tenth of a point or so. Most congressional incumbents were re-elected. House stays GOP. Dems will gain two Senate seats. Several "tea party" darlings went down. McMahon went down and CT is all blue in Congress. My local observations held except my worst fears were realized on the library vote.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »